Sign in

ALAB vs MU

Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock (ALAB) and Micron Technology, Inc. (MU) compared on valuation, profitability, price performance and market sentiment. ALAB sentiment is neutral; MU is positive. Last analyzed Jul 29, 2026 and Jul 11, 2026.

Performance

Each rebased to 0% at the start of its recent history — the gap is relative out/under-performance.

+500%+1000%0%ALAB +173.29%MU +892.70%
ALABMUMU has outperformed over this window
ALAB

Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock

neutral+3
MU

Micron Technology, Inc.

positive+21
Last close
$260.23$979.30
Market cap
$42.99B$1.11T
P/E (TTM)
185.8Stronger: 22.1
Forward P/E
55Stronger: 6.5
Price / book
28.8Stronger: 15.2
Net margin
26.72%Stronger: 55.91%
Revenue growth
+93.40%Stronger: +3.46%
Dividend yield
0.05%
Beta
3.672.14
52-week high
$499.48$1,255.00
52-week low
$97.89$103.38

marks the stronger side on ratios, margins, growth and yield. Levels like price and market cap aren’t scored.

Where they differ

Astera Labs, Inc. Common Stock

Technology · Semiconductors

Astera Labs designs semiconductor-based connectivity products for cloud and AI infrastructure. Its portfolio centers on an intelligent connectivity platform that pairs high-speed, mixed-signal hardware with embedded microcontrollers and sensors, alongside the COSMOS software suite for managing and optimizing connectivity across large data-center fleets. Specific products include PCIe/CXL retimers and cable modules, Ethernet smart cable modules, CXL memory controllers, and fabric switches. The company sells primarily to hyperscale data-center operators and system equipment manufacturers. Astera Labs was incorporated in 2017 and is headquartered in San Jose, California.

Full ALAB overview →

Micron Technology, Inc.

Technology · Semiconductors

Micron Technology designs, manufactures, and sells memory and storage products. Founded in 1978 and headquartered in Boise, Idaho, it is one of the few remaining large-scale producers of DRAM and NAND flash memory, and it sells under the Micron brand as well as the consumer-facing Crucial brand. The product line spans DRAM components and modules, low-power memory for mobile devices, graphics memory, high-bandwidth memory used in data center and AI accelerator systems, and CXL-based memory, alongside NAND-based storage such as data center and client solid-state drives, managed NAND, and memory cards. Micron organizes its business around four end markets — cloud memory, core data center, mobile and client, and automotive and embedded — and reaches customers through a direct sales force, distributors, retailers, and online channels. It also publishes design and support tools, including power calculators, simulation models, compatibility guides, and firmware and drivers, to help customers integrate its parts.

Full MU overview →

ALAB vs MU: frequently asked questions

Which has the higher market cap, ALAB or MU?

MU has the higher market capitalization. ALAB is about $42.99B, compared with about $1.11T for MU.

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ALAB or MU?

MU has the lower trailing P/E. ALAB trades at 185.8 times trailing earnings, versus 22.1 for MU.

Which has stronger market sentiment, ALAB or MU?

MU has the stronger composite sentiment score. ALAB scores 3 and MU scores 21 on a −100 to +100 scale.

Full comparison

Go deeper on ALAB and MU

Line up margins, growth, valuation and shared ETF exposure side by side — then read the full thesis, signals and risk levels behind each name.