ORCL vs PANW
Oracle Corp (ORCL) and Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Common Stock (PANW) compared on valuation, profitability, price performance and market sentiment. ORCL sentiment is positive; PANW is neutral. Last analyzed Jul 10, 2026 and Jul 30, 2026.
Performance
Each rebased to 0% at the start of its recent history — the gap is relative out/under-performance.
- Last close
- $140.49$314.15
- Market cap
- $415.42B$262.02B
- P/E (TTM)
- Stronger: 24.7277.2
- Forward P/E
- Stronger: 13.277.9
- Price / book
- 11.1Stronger: 9.4
- Net margin
- Stronger: 25.37%7.95%
- Revenue growth
- +20.60%Stronger: +31.10%
- Dividend yield
- 1.42%—
- Beta
- 1.710.91
- 52-week high
- $345.72$368.80
- 52-week low
- $134.57$139.57
marks the stronger side on ratios, margins, growth and yield. Levels like price and market cap aren’t scored.
Where they differ
Oracle Corp
Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Oracle Corporation builds and sells the software and hardware that organizations use to run their information technology systems. Its cloud applications business covers enterprise resource planning, financial planning, supply chain, human resources, sales and service, and healthcare, sold both through the Fusion suite for larger enterprises and NetSuite for smaller ones. Underneath those applications sits Oracle's infrastructure business: the Oracle Database and MySQL, Java, middleware and development tools, and Oracle Cloud Infrastructure, which provides compute, storage, and networking, along with engineered systems, servers, and storage hardware. Customers include businesses, government agencies, and educational institutions, reached through a direct sales force and indirect channels. Oracle offers its technology through cloud subscriptions and traditional software licenses, with support and consulting services alongside both. The company was founded in 1977 and is headquartered in Austin, Texas.
Full ORCL overview →Palo Alto Networks, Inc. Common Stock
Technology · Software - Infrastructure
Palo Alto Networks is a cybersecurity company headquartered in Santa Clara, California, serving customers across the Americas, EMEA, and Asia Pacific. Its portfolio spans three broad areas: network security, including hardware and virtual firewalls, the Prisma Access secure access service edge offering, and centralized management through Strata Cloud Manager; cloud security, covering protection for applications and workloads across multi-cloud and hybrid environments; and security operations, delivered through the Cortex platform, which includes XSIAM for AI-driven security operations, XDR for threat detection and response, XSOAR for orchestration and automation, and Xpanse for attack surface management. The company also offers security for AI deployments and provides threat intelligence and incident response services under the Unit 42 name. Much of the business is subscription-based, with services covering areas such as threat prevention, URL filtering, DNS security, data loss prevention, IoT security, and SaaS application security, alongside support, professional services, and training and certification programs. Palo Alto Networks was incorporated in 2005 and sells through channel partners as well as directly to enterprises, service providers, and government organizations across industries including financial services, healthcare, energy, manufacturing, telecommunications, education, and the public sector.
Full PANW overview →ORCL vs PANW: frequently asked questions
Which has the higher market cap, ORCL or PANW?
ORCL has the higher market capitalization. ORCL is about $415.42B, compared with about $262.02B for PANW.
Which has the lower trailing P/E, ORCL or PANW?
ORCL has the lower trailing P/E. ORCL trades at 24.7 times trailing earnings, versus 277.2 for PANW.
Which has stronger market sentiment, ORCL or PANW?
ORCL has the stronger composite sentiment score. ORCL scores 14 and PANW scores 12 on a −100 to +100 scale.
Go deeper on ORCL and PANW
Line up margins, growth, valuation and shared ETF exposure side by side — then read the full thesis, signals and risk levels behind each name.